Your process
The actual work and the investment decisions around it.
We develop models and agents for individual venture firms, built around their investment strategy, institutional knowledge, approved data and operating practices.
Show us what your team is doing today, where judgment matters and where structured work can be delegated to an agent. We design the system around the actual task, the available evidence and the people responsible for the outcome.
These are potential custom engagements, not a catalog of prebuilt applications. The scope of each engagement is defined with the firm.
Build sourcing intelligence around the markets and signals your team cares about.
02 / EvaluateReflect your firm’s screening questions and research standards in models and agents.
03 / DiligenceHelp teams work through fund-specific diligence and prepare decision materials.
04 / MonitorMake portfolio data and company reporting more useful to the investment team.
05 / ReportDesign agents around internal reporting and investor communication workflows.
06 / RememberMake past research and investment context usable across the firm.
A model built for one part of the investment process may depend on research, historical decisions or approved records from another. The system’s data access and context should be deliberately designed, not assumed.
The actual work and the investment decisions around it.
Relevant evidence, access boundaries and permissions defined with the fund.
Purpose-built components and scoped agent behavior.
Documented, contractually defined deployment and handover.
The architecture depends on what the fund needs. It may use existing model providers, custom components, configured tools and permissioned information sources, with the boundaries agreed before delivery.
Defined behaviors, evaluation examples and output expectations aligned with the workflow.
Tool use, sequences, review points and escalation rules for the jobs the system is permitted to perform.
Documented build scope, operating environment, licenses, rights and agreed handover materials.
A partner might describe a decision that takes too long. A CTO might describe a system the team cannot safely extend. A principal might describe the research that gets repeated each week.
Tell us how your fund currently approaches the workflow. We’ll explore what a custom model or agent would actually require.