Tailored models + agents

No two funds operate alike. Neither should their AI.

We develop models and agents for individual venture firms, built around their investment strategy, institutional knowledge, approved data and operating practices.

01 / Your fund. Your system.

We begin with a workflow. Not a feature list.

Show us what your team is doing today, where judgment matters and where structured work can be delegated to an agent. We design the system around the actual task, the available evidence and the people responsible for the outcome.

03 / The connecting layer

Institutional knowledge should travel across workflows.

A model built for one part of the investment process may depend on research, historical decisions or approved records from another. The system’s data access and context should be deliberately designed, not assumed.

04 / Commission a system

Built to match your firm’s reality.

01

Your process

The actual work and the investment decisions around it.

02

Agreed sources

Relevant evidence, access boundaries and permissions defined with the fund.

03

Your model + agents

Purpose-built components and scoped agent behavior.

04

Your deliverables

Documented, contractually defined deployment and handover.

05 / What we actually engineer

Models establish the logic. Agents carry out the work.

The architecture depends on what the fund needs. It may use existing model providers, custom components, configured tools and permissioned information sources, with the boundaries agreed before delivery.

01 / Model

How information is interpreted

Defined behaviors, evaluation examples and output expectations aligned with the workflow.

02 / Agent

How a scoped task gets done

Tool use, sequences, review points and escalation rules for the jobs the system is permitted to perform.

03 / Delivery

How the system is retained

Documented build scope, operating environment, licenses, rights and agreed handover materials.

06 / Choose an entry point

The first conversation is about the work.

A partner might describe a decision that takes too long. A CTO might describe a system the team cannot safely extend. A principal might describe the research that gets repeated each week.

Partner / GPWhere is valuable investment judgment being crowded out by process?
CTO / Technology leadWhat needs clear architecture, governance and delivery rights?
Principal / Investment teamWhere does evidence gathering slow down a live decision?
A working conversation

Start with the part of investing you want to rethink.

Tell us how your fund currently approaches the workflow. We’ll explore what a custom model or agent would actually require.